BT2008
07-08-2009, 10:08 PM
Hey All,
For everyone suffering with IC, finding the safest drinking water is probably one of the most important treatments that we can do for ourselves, without a doctor's appointment and without a prescription.
For over eight-months I drank Brita Filtered Water almost exclusively, or on occasion I drank store-bought bottled water (I never could afford Evian). But, rather than take a chance on our public tap water, I assumed that by filtering the tap water that I was removing all of the harmful chemicals in it and saving a lot of money in the process! I was convinced, without question, that I was doing the very best thing I could do for my diseased bladder. And, paying $20.00 every couple of months for the filters was well worth the price of saving my bladder from further destruction!
Well, I was wrong. Very wrong, in fact. In short, back in April--much to my amazement--I discovered that the Brita Filtered Water I had been depending upon to sooth and protect my bladder actually had a pH of less than 5.0, which is VERY acidic!! I couldn't believe it! I had essentially been drinking acid-water for months! Then, when I checked our tap water to see how much more acidic it was, assuming of course that it was more acidic, I was totally stunned to find that it actually had a pH of 7.0--which is perfectly neutral!! And, perfect for my IC bladder!! I immediately poured out the filtered water and started drinking the tap water. And--I kid you not--within 2-3 hours my pain had significantly decreased at least an entire level or more!!
Apparently, the Brita Filter had been so good at what it did, it filtered out all of the good minerals in the tap water!! The minerals that maintained its' perfect pH balance. I had been stripping our perfectly balanced tap water of all the essential nutrients by "trying to make it a better water!" Since then, I have used the pH testing strips to check quite a few different bottled waters as well, and our tap water is still the most perfectly balanced water that I can drink for my bladder!
The moral of this story is: Do not make the mistake of assuming that just because it costs more, or because "it's bottled" that any water is a superior water to that which comes straight out of your water faucet. Invest in some pH testing strips (about $10 for a lot of strips) and check the local water in your area and compare it to the bottled waters you have been drinking. I promise, it is well worth the $10.00, because if you have been drinking less than a 6.0 pH drinking water, and you start drinking water that tests between 6.0 and 8.0 (preferably 7.0), then you too will be able to tell a significant difference in your pain and other symptoms! (No, it is not a cure, but it does make a huge difference!)
Since April, I have posted this same information several other times in various places on the forum, but when I read this article a few minutes ago, I thought my story would make an excellent lead-in for this new and very important consumer report--especially for IC consumers (please note, however, that although "filtered water" is recommended, keep my story in mind that this is not necessarily better at all; it may be that the actual tap water itself, unfiltered, straight from the faucet, is actually much healthier!):
Stricter labeling urged for bottled water
New report shows most know more about what’s in tap water
The Associated Press
updated 1:00 p.m. CT, Wed., July 8, 2009
Consumers know less about the water they pay dearly for in bottles than what they can drink almost for free from the tap because the two are regulated differently, congressional investigators and nonprofit researchers say in new reports.
Both the Government Accountability Office and the Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit research and advocacy organization, recommend in reports released Wednesday that bottled water be labeled with the same level of information municipal water providers must disclose.
The researchers urged Americans to make bottled water "a distant second choice" to filtered tap water because there isn't enough information about bottled water. The working group recommends purifying tap water with a commercial filter, however.
Both reports were released at a congressional subcommittee Wednesday morning.
Bottled water — an industry worth about $16 billion in sales last year — has been suffering lately as colleges, communities and some governments take measures to limit or ban its consumption. As employers, they are motivated by cost savings and environmental concern because the bottles often are not recycled.
Bottled water sales were growing by double-digit percentages for years and were helping buoy the U.S. beverage industry overall. But they were flat last year, according to trade publication Beverage Digest.
Beverage Digest editor John Sicher said some consumers are turning on the tap during the recession simply because it's cheaper.
From 1997 to 2007, the amount of bottled water consumed per person in the U.S. more than doubled, from 13.4 gallons to 29.3 gallons, the GAO report said.
The issue before a subcommittee of the Energy and Commerce Committee was less about waste and water quality concerns and more about the mechanics of regulating bottled water.
Nutrition information
As a food product, bottled water is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration and required to show nutrition information and ingredients on its labels. Municipal water is under the control of the Environmental Protection Agency.
The two agencies have similar standards for water quality, but the FDA has less authority to enforce them, the GAO said, and the environmental agency requires much more testing.
Subcommittee chairman Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., said the subcommittee was requesting information Wednesday from a dozen bottled water companies on their water sources, treatment methods and two years' results of contaminant testing. It was not immediately clear which companies were being contacted.
"Consumers may not realize that many regulations that apply to municipalities responsible for tap water do not apply to companies that produce bottled water," he said in statements opening the hearing.
The GAO noted the FDA has yet to set standards for DEHP, one of several chemicals known as phthalates that are found in many household products, while the EPA limits the presence of phthalates in tap water.
In a survey of officials in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, the GAO found they think consumers are misinformed about bottled water.
"Many replied that consumers often believe that bottled water is safer or healthier than tap water," according to the GAO report.
The Washington, D.C.-based Environmental Working Group said in its report that consumers do not get enough information to determine which water is best for them.
Both groups said some bottled water brands include the same information required of tap water providers on either labels or company Web sites.
The GAO called for more research but said the FDA should start by requiring that bottled water labels tell consumers where to find out more.
Community water systems must distribute annual reports about their water's source, contaminants and possible health concerns.
Consumers should know where all their water comes from, how it is treated and what is found in it, said Richard Wiles, senior vice president for policy and communications for the Environmental Working Group.
"If the municipal tap water systems can tell their customers this information, you would think that bottled water companies that charge 1,000 times more for this water could also let consumers know the same thing," he told The Associated Press.
The bottled water industry's trade group, the International Bottled Water Association, planned to testify Wednesday that the product, — subject to the same regulation as other soft drinks, teas, juices and other beverages — is safe. Additional standards apply for bottled water products labeled as "purified water" or "spring water," among other labels, because they must prove a connection to those sources, according to planned testimony from Joseph Doss, president and chief executive of the International Bottled Water Association.
Doss said consumers can learn about bottled water by contacting the company, reading its Web site and visiting sites run by state governments.
State safeguards for bottled water often exceed the federal, though they are less stringent than for tap water, the GAO wrote.
The trade group declined to comment on the reports before they are released.
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31802507/ns/health-food_safety/
MSN Privacy . Legal
© 2009 MSNBC.com
For everyone suffering with IC, finding the safest drinking water is probably one of the most important treatments that we can do for ourselves, without a doctor's appointment and without a prescription.
For over eight-months I drank Brita Filtered Water almost exclusively, or on occasion I drank store-bought bottled water (I never could afford Evian). But, rather than take a chance on our public tap water, I assumed that by filtering the tap water that I was removing all of the harmful chemicals in it and saving a lot of money in the process! I was convinced, without question, that I was doing the very best thing I could do for my diseased bladder. And, paying $20.00 every couple of months for the filters was well worth the price of saving my bladder from further destruction!
Well, I was wrong. Very wrong, in fact. In short, back in April--much to my amazement--I discovered that the Brita Filtered Water I had been depending upon to sooth and protect my bladder actually had a pH of less than 5.0, which is VERY acidic!! I couldn't believe it! I had essentially been drinking acid-water for months! Then, when I checked our tap water to see how much more acidic it was, assuming of course that it was more acidic, I was totally stunned to find that it actually had a pH of 7.0--which is perfectly neutral!! And, perfect for my IC bladder!! I immediately poured out the filtered water and started drinking the tap water. And--I kid you not--within 2-3 hours my pain had significantly decreased at least an entire level or more!!
Apparently, the Brita Filter had been so good at what it did, it filtered out all of the good minerals in the tap water!! The minerals that maintained its' perfect pH balance. I had been stripping our perfectly balanced tap water of all the essential nutrients by "trying to make it a better water!" Since then, I have used the pH testing strips to check quite a few different bottled waters as well, and our tap water is still the most perfectly balanced water that I can drink for my bladder!
The moral of this story is: Do not make the mistake of assuming that just because it costs more, or because "it's bottled" that any water is a superior water to that which comes straight out of your water faucet. Invest in some pH testing strips (about $10 for a lot of strips) and check the local water in your area and compare it to the bottled waters you have been drinking. I promise, it is well worth the $10.00, because if you have been drinking less than a 6.0 pH drinking water, and you start drinking water that tests between 6.0 and 8.0 (preferably 7.0), then you too will be able to tell a significant difference in your pain and other symptoms! (No, it is not a cure, but it does make a huge difference!)
Since April, I have posted this same information several other times in various places on the forum, but when I read this article a few minutes ago, I thought my story would make an excellent lead-in for this new and very important consumer report--especially for IC consumers (please note, however, that although "filtered water" is recommended, keep my story in mind that this is not necessarily better at all; it may be that the actual tap water itself, unfiltered, straight from the faucet, is actually much healthier!):
Stricter labeling urged for bottled water
New report shows most know more about what’s in tap water
The Associated Press
updated 1:00 p.m. CT, Wed., July 8, 2009
Consumers know less about the water they pay dearly for in bottles than what they can drink almost for free from the tap because the two are regulated differently, congressional investigators and nonprofit researchers say in new reports.
Both the Government Accountability Office and the Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit research and advocacy organization, recommend in reports released Wednesday that bottled water be labeled with the same level of information municipal water providers must disclose.
The researchers urged Americans to make bottled water "a distant second choice" to filtered tap water because there isn't enough information about bottled water. The working group recommends purifying tap water with a commercial filter, however.
Both reports were released at a congressional subcommittee Wednesday morning.
Bottled water — an industry worth about $16 billion in sales last year — has been suffering lately as colleges, communities and some governments take measures to limit or ban its consumption. As employers, they are motivated by cost savings and environmental concern because the bottles often are not recycled.
Bottled water sales were growing by double-digit percentages for years and were helping buoy the U.S. beverage industry overall. But they were flat last year, according to trade publication Beverage Digest.
Beverage Digest editor John Sicher said some consumers are turning on the tap during the recession simply because it's cheaper.
From 1997 to 2007, the amount of bottled water consumed per person in the U.S. more than doubled, from 13.4 gallons to 29.3 gallons, the GAO report said.
The issue before a subcommittee of the Energy and Commerce Committee was less about waste and water quality concerns and more about the mechanics of regulating bottled water.
Nutrition information
As a food product, bottled water is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration and required to show nutrition information and ingredients on its labels. Municipal water is under the control of the Environmental Protection Agency.
The two agencies have similar standards for water quality, but the FDA has less authority to enforce them, the GAO said, and the environmental agency requires much more testing.
Subcommittee chairman Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., said the subcommittee was requesting information Wednesday from a dozen bottled water companies on their water sources, treatment methods and two years' results of contaminant testing. It was not immediately clear which companies were being contacted.
"Consumers may not realize that many regulations that apply to municipalities responsible for tap water do not apply to companies that produce bottled water," he said in statements opening the hearing.
The GAO noted the FDA has yet to set standards for DEHP, one of several chemicals known as phthalates that are found in many household products, while the EPA limits the presence of phthalates in tap water.
In a survey of officials in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, the GAO found they think consumers are misinformed about bottled water.
"Many replied that consumers often believe that bottled water is safer or healthier than tap water," according to the GAO report.
The Washington, D.C.-based Environmental Working Group said in its report that consumers do not get enough information to determine which water is best for them.
Both groups said some bottled water brands include the same information required of tap water providers on either labels or company Web sites.
The GAO called for more research but said the FDA should start by requiring that bottled water labels tell consumers where to find out more.
Community water systems must distribute annual reports about their water's source, contaminants and possible health concerns.
Consumers should know where all their water comes from, how it is treated and what is found in it, said Richard Wiles, senior vice president for policy and communications for the Environmental Working Group.
"If the municipal tap water systems can tell their customers this information, you would think that bottled water companies that charge 1,000 times more for this water could also let consumers know the same thing," he told The Associated Press.
The bottled water industry's trade group, the International Bottled Water Association, planned to testify Wednesday that the product, — subject to the same regulation as other soft drinks, teas, juices and other beverages — is safe. Additional standards apply for bottled water products labeled as "purified water" or "spring water," among other labels, because they must prove a connection to those sources, according to planned testimony from Joseph Doss, president and chief executive of the International Bottled Water Association.
Doss said consumers can learn about bottled water by contacting the company, reading its Web site and visiting sites run by state governments.
State safeguards for bottled water often exceed the federal, though they are less stringent than for tap water, the GAO wrote.
The trade group declined to comment on the reports before they are released.
Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31802507/ns/health-food_safety/
MSN Privacy . Legal
© 2009 MSNBC.com