SandraCT
04-13-2009, 03:30 PM
I had a hydro-distention and biopsy 10 years ago. I woke up in screaming pain and was sent home with a catheter for 2 weeks as I was told my bladder was VERY inflamed. I swore I'd never have that procedure done again. Well now it's 10 years later and I'm in worse shape than ever. My symptoms back then were similar to a UTI (urg/frequency/burning) and urinating up to 40 times a day. Well in the last 2 years, I now in addition to all those symptoms, even have retention and leakage. My stream is very hesitant and weak flow - mostly just dribbles and it starts and stops. I'm not emptying completely. Sometimes I feel the urge to go and somedays I have no feeling to go even after drinking lots of water. I was now told that my bladder can hold a very large amount. I'm wondering if the hydro made things worse for me.
But now my Gynocologist wants to do an ablation on my uterus and also have a Urologist in there to do another hydro. He feels it's necessary and would be wise to do the procedures at the same time. I told him my concern after the last one. He said the Urologist said the reason I had all that burning was probably because that former Urologist did an instill at the same time. He thinks that's why I was sent home with the catheter. I'm a bit confused by all of this and wondering what I should do. I mean is the instill necessary? Although I was in bad pain for weeks, once I finally healed, I felt better for a couple years. From what he's telling me, he'd do just the hydro/biopsy. What is the hydro for? I guess what I'm trying to say is would it be beneficial without the instill? I'm so nervous about all of this and it's getting me depressed. I'm worried that any of these procedures will make me worse and I'm especially concerned about the retention I now have. I'll die if that becomes worse after hydro.
Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you all!
But now my Gynocologist wants to do an ablation on my uterus and also have a Urologist in there to do another hydro. He feels it's necessary and would be wise to do the procedures at the same time. I told him my concern after the last one. He said the Urologist said the reason I had all that burning was probably because that former Urologist did an instill at the same time. He thinks that's why I was sent home with the catheter. I'm a bit confused by all of this and wondering what I should do. I mean is the instill necessary? Although I was in bad pain for weeks, once I finally healed, I felt better for a couple years. From what he's telling me, he'd do just the hydro/biopsy. What is the hydro for? I guess what I'm trying to say is would it be beneficial without the instill? I'm so nervous about all of this and it's getting me depressed. I'm worried that any of these procedures will make me worse and I'm especially concerned about the retention I now have. I'll die if that becomes worse after hydro.
Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you all!