Pipcat
07-29-2005, 10:36 AM
Hi!
I have been reading the posts here and am new.
Have researched on diagnostics until blue in the face.
Think I have had IC since early childhood...mild case.
For the in-office cystoscopy to rule out other things, do they always use the rigid steel thing to insert in to biopsy tissue, if they see something?
Or, can they do a biopsy with the flexible device also?
Is the flexible less painful or discomforting than the rigid cystoscope? (I know for men, they say to run if their uro insists on the rigid...makes sense, but us women need less pain too).
Do they always put in a catheter? Isn't there some type of catheter that is safer to use other than latex (less risk of infection)?
Is the in-office cystoscopy less risky than the hydrodistention cysto (less likely to have wall perforation)?
I had an in-office colonoscopy done recently and they injected something to 'knock me out'. I still was aware during the procedure, but felt NO DISCOMFORT AT ALL. I wonder why they can't do that for a cystoscopy, besides the lidocaine numbing or in place of it?
Had a cystoscopy to take a stent out after a total hysterectomy some years ago...did not like it, although survived. Older now, and more knowledge I have, more afraid of a setback from these invasive things.
Well, posting this, in case someone has some answers.
Thanks for any insights!
Pipcat :bunny:
I have been reading the posts here and am new.
Have researched on diagnostics until blue in the face.
Think I have had IC since early childhood...mild case.
For the in-office cystoscopy to rule out other things, do they always use the rigid steel thing to insert in to biopsy tissue, if they see something?
Or, can they do a biopsy with the flexible device also?
Is the flexible less painful or discomforting than the rigid cystoscope? (I know for men, they say to run if their uro insists on the rigid...makes sense, but us women need less pain too).
Do they always put in a catheter? Isn't there some type of catheter that is safer to use other than latex (less risk of infection)?
Is the in-office cystoscopy less risky than the hydrodistention cysto (less likely to have wall perforation)?
I had an in-office colonoscopy done recently and they injected something to 'knock me out'. I still was aware during the procedure, but felt NO DISCOMFORT AT ALL. I wonder why they can't do that for a cystoscopy, besides the lidocaine numbing or in place of it?
Had a cystoscopy to take a stent out after a total hysterectomy some years ago...did not like it, although survived. Older now, and more knowledge I have, more afraid of a setback from these invasive things.
Well, posting this, in case someone has some answers.
Thanks for any insights!
Pipcat :bunny: