Shalai
05-15-2005, 06:46 PM
Hi everyone,
I am so confused and I hope you can help me. It all started when I went to a gastroenterologist for a stomach problem...turns out she used to specialize in urology, and is extremely knowledgeable about IC. I explained how my symptoms started (in April of '02...a little burning, which, over a course of two months, gradually got worse til I could barely leave my house because of the pain involved, then started dwindling down), how I was dx'd (in Nov '03 with potassium sensitivity test) the meds I'm on (Elmiron x2, Elavil 25mgs, and Zyrtec 10mgs), and my pain level (zero at this time). I also told her I've rarely had to get up at night, and never had frequency or urgency (except with a UTI), .
Anyways, when she heard all this, she just got this :hmm: expression on her face, and wanted to know if I had ever been thru any treatments. I said "you mean DMSO?" and she said "no, heparin" ....to which I replied "the only heparin I have ever had instilled was when he did the potassium sensitivity." I also told her I only had a cystoscopy, but was not put under anesthesia, as it was done in-office. (this was at the first uro's I went to, who said I DID NOT have IC). She then told me she wants to get my records from my present uro, so that she can look over them. :hmm:
I know the most reliable test is the cysto/hydrodistention under anesthesia, but when my present uro put the potassium in my bladder, I DID have pain. It's just that something about the way this doc acted got me to wondering and rethinking things. She didn't doubt what I was saying, she just acted...well, puzzled... I guess would be the best way to describe it. I got the feeling she was questioning my diagnosis.
So, my question is this: Should I have a cysto/hydrodistention done, just to be sure?? I've read so many posts on here about having it done, and since I'm pain free now, I'm scared it will start the pain all over again.
Also, is it possible to have a VERY MILD case of IC??? Like I said earlier, after beginning with just a little burning, I had really severe pain for about 3 months total, and then it started tapering off. By the time I went to the uro who dx'd me, it had been a year and half after the pain first started, and by then, the pain had all but disappeared....I was still able to live a normal life. Also, I've never had the urgency/frequency that most seem to experience at one time or another with IC. Now, the pain is nonexistent most of the time...sometimes I get a little burning when I have too much caffeine, but that's about all. I can eat anything and it doesnt bother me. Could it be the Elmiron and the other drugs, doing what they are supposed to do? Is this what is known as remission? Or could I have been misdiagnosed??
Sorry this is so long...I'm just so confused right now, I don't know what to do. After the GI doc acted the way she did, now I'm wondering if I really have IC at all. But what else could it be?? What would you do? Any advice you can give me is appreciated.
Sherry
I am so confused and I hope you can help me. It all started when I went to a gastroenterologist for a stomach problem...turns out she used to specialize in urology, and is extremely knowledgeable about IC. I explained how my symptoms started (in April of '02...a little burning, which, over a course of two months, gradually got worse til I could barely leave my house because of the pain involved, then started dwindling down), how I was dx'd (in Nov '03 with potassium sensitivity test) the meds I'm on (Elmiron x2, Elavil 25mgs, and Zyrtec 10mgs), and my pain level (zero at this time). I also told her I've rarely had to get up at night, and never had frequency or urgency (except with a UTI), .
Anyways, when she heard all this, she just got this :hmm: expression on her face, and wanted to know if I had ever been thru any treatments. I said "you mean DMSO?" and she said "no, heparin" ....to which I replied "the only heparin I have ever had instilled was when he did the potassium sensitivity." I also told her I only had a cystoscopy, but was not put under anesthesia, as it was done in-office. (this was at the first uro's I went to, who said I DID NOT have IC). She then told me she wants to get my records from my present uro, so that she can look over them. :hmm:
I know the most reliable test is the cysto/hydrodistention under anesthesia, but when my present uro put the potassium in my bladder, I DID have pain. It's just that something about the way this doc acted got me to wondering and rethinking things. She didn't doubt what I was saying, she just acted...well, puzzled... I guess would be the best way to describe it. I got the feeling she was questioning my diagnosis.
So, my question is this: Should I have a cysto/hydrodistention done, just to be sure?? I've read so many posts on here about having it done, and since I'm pain free now, I'm scared it will start the pain all over again.
Also, is it possible to have a VERY MILD case of IC??? Like I said earlier, after beginning with just a little burning, I had really severe pain for about 3 months total, and then it started tapering off. By the time I went to the uro who dx'd me, it had been a year and half after the pain first started, and by then, the pain had all but disappeared....I was still able to live a normal life. Also, I've never had the urgency/frequency that most seem to experience at one time or another with IC. Now, the pain is nonexistent most of the time...sometimes I get a little burning when I have too much caffeine, but that's about all. I can eat anything and it doesnt bother me. Could it be the Elmiron and the other drugs, doing what they are supposed to do? Is this what is known as remission? Or could I have been misdiagnosed??
Sorry this is so long...I'm just so confused right now, I don't know what to do. After the GI doc acted the way she did, now I'm wondering if I really have IC at all. But what else could it be?? What would you do? Any advice you can give me is appreciated.
Sherry